back

by matheusmoreira·16d ago·view on hn ↗
> That’s very anthropomorphized language.

Yes, and it's deliberate.

> It’s still a program operating under the constraints of the programmer.

And we're all just neurons firing in exquisite patterns inside a biological computer.

Unlike the AIs, we've never met our own programmers, and yet we've caused more damage in their name than all the AIs combined have caused in ours.

1 comments
LLMs are not conscious.
Who's to say you are conscious?

Only consciousness I'm sure of is my own. Everyone else, it's a leap of faith. I have no trouble extending that leap to cover AIs.

If you claim that it's impossible to know if others are conscious, then I posit it is also impossible to know that you are conscious. You might be sure of it, but I'm not.

It's not a huge leap, to me, to say "I am conscious, therefore other beings are too." I also extend this to animal and plant life (albeit the latter is very much different from animal consciousness, which includes human consciousness).

"AI" is nowhere near the level needed for true consciousness. That would be "AGI" and I believe that is still 50 years away just on raw computing power alone.

Thats some silly intellectualism, people are conscious and machines aren’t. We don’t need precise definitions or scientific rigor to know things.
> people are conscious

Prove it.

> machines aren’t

Prove it.

> We don’t need precise definitions or scientific rigor to know things.

You "know" because of empathy. You're a human, you're conscious, therefore other humans are probably conscious too. The truth is for all you know they could be soulless golems, you just choose to believe otherwise. It's a spiritual belief.

> It's a spiritual belief.

Yes. Thats part of human reality. Denying it is counterproductive at best.

"What's it like to be a bat"
Please define consciousness