▲ 75 points
back
15 comments
I enjoyed reading this. I have been making my way through Needham's Visual Complex Analysis (https://global.oup.com/academic/product/visual-complex-analy...) book which takes a similar visual-focused view of teaching all of complex analysis. Chapter 2 in particular covers multivalue functions and branch points to make a similar point about how some paths will yield different values at same points.
Needham is great and his Visual Differential Geometry and Forms is excellent.
Yes im reading it now. I find that the total lack of formalism makes things difficult from time to time just like his insistence on using basic geometry when there are easier ways. That being said, its an excellent book.
Here's the reason you need enginners in the universe. Yes, the strip has non-orientability. Howwever, just introduce spin about the center, as you would a wheel, and you get all the same benefits of orientation as long as you're not in a completely empty void in space. Upside sees constantly changing, inside sees the other side of the strip.
I think you are saying something interesting. Could you elaborate a little though because I am not quite getting you yet hooked to understand what you are saying.
Spin gets you centripetal force. You know where inside and outside are globally because the forces will be opposite depending on which "side" you're standing, which directly contradicts their statement "..globally you cannot label one side as up and one side as down. If you try to label one side as up, and then you move continuously around the Möbius strip, you'll end up labelling that same side as down!"
I get what you're saying, but with the spin you need to introduce the notion of movement, mass and force. It adds complexity you might not be able to afford, especially since typically you want to investigate a whole bunch of shapes, not just one strip.
Also, since everything on your model is continuous, there must be a point on the strip where the centrifugal force is 0. Is that point inside or outside?
Note that for a particle there is no discrepancy.
>introduce the notion of movement, mass and force
Hence my statement about not being in a void.
>Is that point inside or outside?
Depends on which foot is inside and which is not. That's the beauty of reality. It's fully deterministic at the marco level.
Ah. I think it's better we don't discuss this topic from a mathematical perspective and agree you can indeed do a lot of different things with a lot of different outcomes.
Got you.
What are you saying should spin? The particle moving along the Mobius strip, or the Mobius strip itself?
Probably junk science, But I like this attempt to describe the electron via möbius twisted em fields.
Thanks to the authors, super-enjoyable and bookmarked. Part of plenty of good stuff.
You know what, that was really cool. I’ve never seen anything like that.