back

by andsoitis·6d ago·view on hn ↗
> Land, housing, water, energy, food, medicines, healthcare, security, and proximity to influence. I'm sure I forgot a few.

And you think the vast majority of people do not have access to the overwhelming majority of those things? The evidence suggests the opposite. The only item in your list I would agree with is "proximity to influence", but it is also the one thing that is totally different from the others in the list.

1 comments
> And you think the vast majority of people do not have access to the overwhelming majority of those things? The evidence suggests the opposite.

The comment I responded to asked:

> Is the Apple fandom strong enough to get Tim Cook his own private army of zealots when society breaks down?

I didn't say we are there now.

Responding to the parent's question about a dystopian future scenario, I said that those are the resources that will become controlled by the few if "society breaks down" due to technofeudalism.