Item — HN Reader

I love such cases... because "almost" all of them have hidden political agendas... so, as usual, I let my investigative agent run over this and prepare me detailed connections graph between prominent personnel, orgs, funding, and political connections...

https://5rights.stupidlabs.lol/

Disclaimer: this project of mine is still in development, and not quote 100% accurate.. so, take it with a bit of salt.. do your own research...

Also, this is running on a cheap server... please don't hammer it..

4 comments

Yo this is an excellent use of LLMs...

Is there any connection with the 5rights foundation?

Search for "5rights foundation" in that "search graph" box on left side, then click on relevant search result from below (dont click on + icon.. thats for finding routes) ... and the graph will adjust to this node and show all connections..

btw, one of them most powerful feature is finding connections between any nodes... just search for them one by one, click "+" on searched entity, do this for both, or more.. then click: "shortest path" ... you can investigative how anyone is connected to anyone else

For example: "Center for American Progress" is connected to "UK House of Lords" through this long chain:::

Center for American Progress -> [has former fellow] -> Simon Clark -> [board chair of] -> Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) — US -> [lobbied for] -> KOSA / KOSPA (Kids Online Safety Act / Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act) -> [engaged with] -> 5Rights Foundation <- [founded] <- Baroness Beeban Kidron (Beeban Tania Kidron, Baroness Kidron) <- [has member] UK House of Lords

Graph: https://ibb.co/tTL0cGjm

Sorry, I feed stupid to ask, but what does the graph tell us in that particular case?

"Connections"... how most important personnel from 5rights are associated with other entities (people, org, events, etc), that can directly, or indirectly, connect to political circle... thus, act as political influence network...

Very nice, this is what investigative journalism should be doing as well, but if it's "democratized" by just putting it up on a website we don't need to wait for anyone to publish it.

As long as all the sources are listed and verifiable, of course.

There's huge power in collective investigations... of course, as you rightly said, the sources should be mentioned (though this is not always possible to safeguard whistleblowers, if any).

We need this for everything.

That's super cool!

thanks.. there are a few nodes that are giving error when clicked.. but, i am fixing as i am discovering these... as I said, this is still in development...

Thanks for checking and good words..

Fixed.