>Some country has laws that some other country dislikes, therefore they should be able to ignore them?
Yeah, I think that's pretty much the definition of the right of asylum.
Yeah, I think that's pretty much the definition of the right of asylum.
Granting asylum to someone on another jurisdiction and extraditing them is already problematic.
Granting asylum remotely while they stay in that jurisdiction is unheard of.
And a system admin or service provider like us mortals, don't have the authority to grant asylum.
Like we would say in Argentina, you are peeing outside the bowl.