I'm trying to imagine what being a "power user" of a watch is like. Can anyone enlighten me?
I think smart-watches are much like Alexa. What the user wants to do with it is almost totally at odds with what the company is selling. Alexii are mostly kitchen timers, song players, and light switches. No one is a "power user" constantly installing skills and using it for anything which increases the product team's engagement metrics.
The same is probably true of watches. Alerts are nifty - but cumbersome for replies. The health stuff is useful - but only for a subset of users. Seeing the time is great - but if the battery lasts less than a week, who wants to keep that screen on?
I would say I'm quite a power user usually. I very carefully explored every feature my apple watch has and tried to incorporate as many of them as I could. Very, very few features stuck because they were genuinely helpful. Almost everything being pushed is a gimmick or a feature bullet point from some product manager.
The actual good stuff:
Time
Workouts
Payments
The occasionally useful stuff:
Notifications
Noise DB levels to see if I need to put on ear protection
Workoutdoors app for on-device maps and path breadcrumbs
The once in a blue moon stuff:
Music controls and on device playlists
On device audiobooks
Weather complication
Voice memos
Alarm
Shortcut to call my husband
The feature I tried to get working but gave up on: Tap to talk to ChatGPT and get a 100 word or less reply
Smart watches become shelfware pretty easily. Especially when you don't have the Apple Watch cachet.
I too don't see how the ability to run apps is of any value so I use "sports" watch instead of a "smart" watch, which gives me better screen and better battery life in exchange of a smaller number of apps I won't ever run. Though the battery life is not an issue and smartwatch users I know charge their watch while in the shower.
There is IMO a design flaw that tanked adoption of not just Alexa, but also on-phone voice assistants.
People would want to use reliable equivalent of "computer, play music" or any kind of "computer, do X". But what is on offer by all major companies is, "${brand name}, do X on ${brand name} with ${brand name}". No thanks.
More broadly, I think this is rarely noted explicitly - user interfaces are ultimate marketing platforms, because you get to inject your marketing literally between the user and the task they're doing. Whether purposefully or intuitively, companies understand that, and the UX goes to shit as they design the product to also be a marketing platform.
I don’t care that the battery doesn’t last, I’ve got a wireless charger at my desk and at home and 30 minutes on that a few times a week keeps it alive for my usage.
* Timers
* Alerts
* Step counter/fitness tracker
* My fitness app for weight training - I can start a workout on my phone and enter my set/rep/weight counts without needing to pull my phone out
* Phone calls when I'm on walks and do not want to the "full phone" experience, but also cannot be totally disconnected. This paired with Airpods is a pretty nice balance
* Ditto the above but for podcasts/music streaming - especially if wearing workout clothing and I don't have a comfortable place to carry my phone along.
* Basic replies to my "important people" texts - via Siri dictation mostly
* My "RFID" security badge to get into my home/office/etc. using Apple Pay
* Apple Pay
* Quick glance to check the weather w/ a main screen widget
* Quick glance to check calendar
I liken it to having a mini iPhone 4 strapped to my wrist. Useful here and there, and very nice for when I want to get away from my phone or it's too bulky to bring somewhere. Essentially a basic flip-phone for comms, and a connected streaming media player.
Blood pressure, sleep breathing, and insulin sensitivity trends
> Built on state-of-the-art Health Foundation Models trained on billions of minutes of sensor data from opted-in users and rigorously validated against gold-standard clinical measurements, these models power three new monthly trend summaries: blood pressure trends, sleep breathing quality trends, and insulin resistance trends. Rolling out soon — with your first detailed summary arriving after one month of wear — these reports illuminate metabolic, respiratory and cardiovascular shifts early, giving you clear insights to help you take control of your long-term health. Plus, monthly summaries will soon be available across our wearable portfolio, including the new Google Fitbit Air.I've been using the Garmin Forerunner for a few years now and the battery life is 2 weeks!
What I actually want:
- sleep tracking - basic health tracking - maybe basic GPS to track hikes/runs etc
And potentially an easy way to see certain pertinent info. Like if I’m doing water sports, basic tide info, or my next calendar event, or when I need to get off the bus. But I don’t want an app, and I almost never want notifications. And definitely no clunky app to be distracted by.
Plus, I don’t want a big old screen. I don’t want to charge it a lot. I like my digital Casio a lot.
Feels like this doesn’t really exist
Apparently the GPS is computed in the cloud, which means this only works given LTE coverage or if you also carry your paired smartphone. https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/devices/pixel/pix...
They know this product is garbage
I also enjoy tracking my workouts, my steps, and heart rate.
Sleep mode is great to monitor my breathing, heart rate.
Quick notifications are great in case I have an important and timely email.
Pinging my misplaced phone is helpful too.
For people who want all the niceties of detailed health tracking with good battery life already (should) have a suitable Garmin for them.
This watch isn't even part of the horse race.
Now, I got Pebble Time 2 and I think this is it. Just enough bells and whistles and battery lasts for weeks. Love it!
The fitbit users already have "google heath coach" in the latest googlified version of the app.
And https://www.reddit.com/r/fitbit/ is full of commentary on how laughably crap it is.
I'd pay more to avoid this kind of "feature".
a surprise, especially in this current market. But at the same time, why tf they need so much ram.
P. S. Since it's not even possible to add a new card if the watch is paired to a device that doesn't pass SafetyNet, I've had to add cards with a stock android device, and then re-pair the watch to GrapheneOS device. This almost seems like a deliberate choice by Google.
No new GPUs, CPUs, technologies, etc...
It was superthin with MIP display requiring no backlight and could last 30-40 days on one charge, even now using 6-8 years old piece it can still last 4 weeks, which should probably answer my question why nobody wants to produce long lasting nice watch, you can sell it only once.
Imagine what we could do with MIP and new baterries in same body + imagine if it had open system...
Yeah yeah I know about Pebble Time 2, but it's thicker at 11mm, has no GPS like Bip + most importantly it cost way way more (225USD now vs like 80-99USD in 2018) for pretty much same specs Amazfit Bip had 8 years ago. Why something which cost in 2018 at worst 99USD now cost with worse specs (no GPS) 225USD? It's much easier and cheaper to produce it now.
Round watches are not cool. They end up inconvenient and uncomfortable.
Their brand is so toxic with the forceful rollout of their AI stuff. Staying far far the hell away.
Is this a typo? I get 20 days on the Pebble Time 2.