back

by mikeysight·11h ago·view on hn ↗
That's an interesting thought. One thing that comes to mind is that age-gating is often not a cut and dry boolean granting or denying access to an entire application. It's conceivable and even expected that a social media company may want to allow users of any age to access their platform but are legally required to age-gate a subset experience like adult content, gambling etc. I very much like the main street mental model for this, where we default to open access amidst a broad mix of establishments and scope age-gating as minimally as possible vs. having an "adults only" part of town.
1 comments
Even (redacted) porn, I mean photo sharing, sites have a trivial click-through, or designated area "nudity" not enforced other than perhaps some "this is an adult site" that I ignore.

So, there's an example of division within a site.

No "answer this question" such as "Who is Adlai Stevenson", providing that Claude and others get it wrong and you have to remember (IP-block Google).

Just musing.