Looks like you haven't kept up with the publications except those posted by the conservative foes of climate science like Alex Rawls. There have been many rebuttals of the claim that there is a "game-changing admission" in the leaked document, here's a good one: http://skepticalscience.com/ipcc-draft-leak-global-warming-n...

"Rawls has completely misrepresented the IPCC report."

I don't trust scientific documents being "leaked" - this isn't politics where leaking information does the public a service. This is science, where it's advantageous to wait until the data matures, not spill it immediately. When it's ready for publication and is done so through official, peer vetted channels, I'll consider it authentic.

So, actually, yes, I have kept up with my publications. Furthermore, the person who leaked that has a well known bias against climate change. Coupled with my earlier statement, this holds no scientific weight against what I cited.