It shows the hypocrisy of grabbing pitchforks and torches and pushing out a brilliant mind just because you disagree with his views on marriage which are the same as 51% of all of California.
My proposal: put down the pitchforks, pick up the coffee cups and talk and reason instead of pressure and bully.
You're talking about a nation with a blanket two party system, the world's largest economy, and an extreme tendency to involve itself with global affairs.
I have an extreme aversion to voting for Republicans just due to the socially conservative views, but when the democratic candidates vocally support total global surveillance there's just no other choice. Supporting a candidate does not mean you support their every vote and as in all things with life, you just have to make compromises.
What matters the most is the culture of a country, not whether it has 2, 4, 6, or 27 political parties. A dysfunctional culture with a dozen parties will still produce a dysfunctional political system.
Funny how this works for candidates that you vote for but not for CEOS of products you use.
It worked for the CEO of Mozilla too. Their community just made different compromises.
That's why this was different – a key requirement of Eich's position was to provide a leadership figure for the corporation and also the organisation as a whole, and it's really hard to get behind someone who's actively seeking to strip your rights or those of your friends and family. That's a large group of people to piss off and fail to apologise to.