Here is the project page: http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu/rtw/

If you scroll to the bottom you can see the "facts" this program has most recently learned along with its confidence in them. To me these facts don't look very impressive, since many are wrong or at least show a very stretched approximation of the truth. (Edit: actually I refreshed the list and the content got a lot better, so I might have just hit on a particularly bad set of data)