I'm sure the journalist in question who should learn not to write gibberish, ensure he's inserted his operational definitions and check his prose for floating abstractions is properly put to rights!
I guess you weren't referring to the actual paper since it can hardly
turn out to be interesting and gibberish at one and the same time.
back
1 comments
Since both outcomes are possible, by following the constructor principle, the paper will be in a superimposed quantum state of interesting at gibberish.
And it will collapse in one of those states when somebody (knowledgeable in the field) reads it.
EDIT: the analogy is broken on purpose, to cause a logical paradox