back

by carpdiem·17y ago·view on hn ↗
I think indentured servitude is the wrong way to look at this. The key difference is that the investors don't dictate that you need to achieve a certain level of returns, or that you pursue a certain line of work. Instead you're still free to do whatever you want.

Since these contracts don't impinge on personal freedom, they should be legal. And I dare say that any number of highly motivated and intelligent people would jump at an opportunity like this (myself included), especially with the buy-out clause.

1 comments
I disagree re: indentured servitude. This reminds me of Renaissance sponsorship of artists and musicians, such as Leonardo DaVinci. Why not take something that was proven to work and update it for the modern world?

I'd also look at something like Intellectual Ventures, except on a longer term, where smart people are paid to attend the sessions to generate as many new, useful ideas as possible.