▲ 28 points
back
15 comments
I banned Buzzfeed as much as I could from Twitter and Facebook. This article made me warm up to them again for a bit so I went to their homepage. After the main content here's a few of the top articles as I see them:
Which Porn Star Should You Date? (Get ready for your big D…ate)
12 Gross Smells Every City-Dweller Can Relate To
20 Times Disney Accurately Described Course Registration
This 11-Year-Old Kid Produces His Own Music And It’s Insane
The One Big Clue Bruce Wayne Gave Gotham That He Was Batman
21 Celebrities That Defintiely Put The “F” In DILF
Buzzfeed is disrupting the news/entertainment industry and has found an extremely effective way to entice readers and promote virility among its stories and videos. In any other context people would champion this sort of strategy. Extreme growth hacking coupled with a psychological approach to user acquisition.
I am not a regular buzzfeed reader, but I have tried to become less cynical about the company. They really are the best at what they do. Hopefully with Dixon's $50mm investment via AH, the company will focus a little more on content.
> In any other context people would champion this sort of strategy.
Context is important. A middle-school teacher who finds their kids aren't paying attention during a presentation might attract more interest by including a few porn slides. Imagine the virility through the school. There might be an increase in "user acquisition" using this "psychological approach".
At the end of the day, it's horseshit. Fucking horseshit.
look, i'm not here to champion buzzfeed. Context is important, but to be clear I wouldn't compare buzzfeed to sexually assaulting a classroom full of minors.
He didn't, because that's not sexual assault. Also because it was an analogy about using titillation.
The only real alternative is to pay for our news. Buzzfeed does some okay stuff now and then, by the way.
Let's say you were trying to rationalize why a company's "extreme growth hacking coupled with a psychological approach to user acquisition" was actually good for the world. It's usually not that hard if you want it. Company X provides something that is (arguably) important (to someone), and the marketing means help it reach people.
So I tried to put on this hat for a minute, but I cannot for the life of me even intentionally come up with a justification for BuzzFeed.
Even if you believe whole-heartedly in general that the end (company getting its service out there) justifies the means (marketing, manipulation)... with BuzzFeed the end and the means are exactly the same thing.
It's got all of the societal value of the Jerry Springer show: It's garbage for the sake of providing space to sell garbage.
You can't really value entertainment the way you value something like a machine tool. People who purchase the entertainment consider it its own end, whereas the people who are buying the machine tool will want to know "What other goal will this machine tool help me achieve?"
"an extremely effective way to entice readers"
... you might even say they found one weird trick. Traditional news media hates them. You won't believe what they'll do next.
I don't directly hate Buzzfeed, but I do hate that due to being so successful much of the rest of the industry has emulated them to the point of near saturation. It is getting nearly impossible to consume web content without constantly being subjected to clickbaity garbage (I realize that Buzzfeed actually produces some decent content, but most of those who clumsily emulate them do not).
Of course at the end of the day this is all our fault for being so easily clickbaited by inane stuff.
They are disrupting the yellow journalism industry and provide little to no value in any other segment of news. The reason why people are upset here is because they understand exactly how Buzzfeed, Farmville, and other such companies have inserted themselves using these exploits into our lives providing little to no value (but perhaps to some of those around us).
> ...among it's stories and videos
its*
sorry it's bugging me...
Fixed. Thanks.
Also guessing you meant "virality" and not "virility", but then again maybe you meant to describe BuzzFeed as having a strong, manly sex drive?
I chuckled. I am actually going to leave it as is.
Expound endlessly on the virtues of buzzfeed's journalism if you must. It cannot remove the stench of native advertisement. I will give them no intentional clicks.