Religion was never intended to find "truth", its just something that helps people making their day even when life sucks.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2015/05/10/salon-pu...
I agree with this critique of the new kid's approach to attacking religion, though their services probably do have some value in slowing its advance. Rand, of course, addressed this critique in her work, stating that atheism is not a central tenet or even a very important conclusion in her philosophy. It is a consequence of going by reason but she did not stop there and defined a whole systematic philosophy including metaphysics (existential), epistemology, ethic and politics. So the main question to the New Atheists in this article is "Okay, so you don't believe in God. What do you believe?" None of them have a a consistent, integrated, rational alternative to the proto-philosophy that is religion. The closest is Sam Harris who at least claims it is possible to define an ethic system based on reason but he is not honest enough to do it.