The Little Ice Age was not a good time to be alive, because human economies are tuned up to be optimal in the current climate, whatever it happens to be, and when things change suddenly it takes a generation or two for people to adjust, and since food and other resources are in short supply the natural "solution" the problem is to take up arms and kill people and destroy things, because there is really no better way to ensure a return to surplus conditions than by obliterating the means of production.
There were fairly widespread reports of cannibalism, and although some--like this one--may have been baseless (because it is based on nothing but a gut feeling, and the epistemic utility of our organs of digestion is limited at best) it's pretty clear that it did happen on multiple occasions in both China and Europe.
I don't know enough about the topic to say what the truth is, but I can tell you that arguments for and against it have little to do with the little ice age itself, and everything to do with belief for or against global warming.
Here is one conservative report on the subject: http://www.wnd.com/2009/12/119745/
Thanks for confirming for those of us that were not sure.
actually the paper exactly confirms the Little Ice Age - given that climate effects are cumulative (drought previous year, rain this year - nice, whereis rain previous 10 years makes your environment a swamp no matter what current year is), the smoothing with 25 years moving average is a very reasonable thing and produces result meaningful for climate and its effects upon, in particular, human civilization.
It is said to have happened in 1387 and is described in a 1612 book.
Often times one might find a customer of software who simply doesn't understand the way the system works, or is to be constructed, and they become suspicious of what they are being sold.
Other times, its quite possible to 'eat ones own dog-food' and be fed back a refactored version of an asset they already owned, if not controlled properly, albeit slightly cooked up.
From the customers perspective, it is perfectly reasonable to experience a plethora of these kinds of cannibalistic effects. If you get it on your plate, to save the project: invite the customer to the table. Software system implementation and usage, constructed though a meat pie, are key factors in success, its true, but if your customer does not at least have one finger in the tray, they won't know how fine it tastes. Educate your customer on software systems and why things are, not just that they are, take care of the bad smells with thorough enlightenment, and voila .. dinnertime.
It is a gruesome and utterly deadpan joke.