back
3 comments
I'm always impressed how successful re-branding from "German" to "Nazi" was.

First shift the historical responsibility to some rather abstract "Nazis" and ignore the fact that most of the Jews were Polish citizens, then start encouraging usage of misleading terms (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Polish_death_camp%22_contro...). Give it one century and people will think the victims were aggressors, and vice versa.

As someone who's not familiar with this controversy—I can understand why "Polish death camp" is an undesireable term, but that doesn't seem to be the one that's used here. Are you saying that "Nazi death camp" is an evasive term to which "German death camp" would be preferable? It seems to me (based on knowing some Germans, not any personal experience) that an appreciation of their rôle in, and guilt regarding, the Holocaust is a prominent part of German children's historical education; would replacing 'Nazi' by 'German' really accomplish anything? In addition, I can't help thinking that it might go the other way, encouraging people of other countries (like the US) to think "that was a German action, it could never happen here."
Children in Germany can be educated about their own history, but public in most of the world is not.

For whole world "Polish death camp" sounds like it's Polish responsibility. "Nazi crimes" etc. sounds like it's some abstract Nazis, not democratically elected German government with huge public support. Ignorant public all around the world can think "Who were these Nazis? Maybe they were Polish?" Then things like Jedwabne: http://www.ppu.org.uk/genocide/case4.html gets blew up out of proportions ignoring that there is a plenty of doubt on what actually happen. Rather mediocre movie Ida: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_%28film%29 gets Oscar award, (speculation) because it's main story is about Jedwabne and portraits Polish citizens as Jew-murderers. I see it as slow and continuous process of shifting blame using PR methods, for political and material gain.

All of this in the background of a big controversies and political struggle about Jewish organization claims for retribution money and property.

It's sad that a nation directly most affected by WWII, than struggling with Soviet occupation that was a WWII consequence, now is under PR fire to manipulate world public into blame it for the horror of it.

> encouraging people of other countries (like the US) to think "that was a German action, it could never happen here."

"That was <<Nazi>> action, it could never happen here.