▲ 120 points
back
92 comments
Oh God. This is sounds like the cruelest prank in the world.
From the wikipedia article is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADE_651
" It requires no battery or other power source; its manufacturer claimed that it is powered solely by the user's static electricity. To use the device, the operator must walk for a few moments to "charge" it before holding it at right angles to the body... According to Husam Muhammad, an Iraqi police officer and user of the ADE 651, using the device properly is more of an art than a science: 'If we are tense, the device doesn't work correctly. I start slow, and relax my body, and I try to clear my mind.' In one promotional video McCormick claimed that the device could detect elephants from 48 kilometres (30 mi) away."
They should be charging this guy with murder. Not fraud.
>its manufacturer claimed that it is powered solely by the user's static electricity.
He missed out on a great opportunity to sell proprietary magic battery packs, then. A lump of concrete and a coin cell to shine a LED, all wrapped up in plastic with an oddball connector.
The reason they like the dowsing rod (because that's basically what it is) is that they just like being able to justify any action they take.
The police here in the US would doubtless love these things. A "scientific" reason to search anyone you feel suspicious of? Sign them right up!
It's merely a less baroque version of "drug-sniffing" dogs (who cue from their handlers) and polygraph tests.
Who needs a dowsing rod when can actually control media outlets?
I agree that he should be charged with fraud.
However the purchasers should be charged with criminal negligence. It's up to them to check the claims of the device in question and test it before putting it in the hands of people.
Are you sure?
If I buy floor cleaner based on a sales brochure describing a safe and sanitary cleaning product, and it turns out to be Hydrofluoric Acid - am I supposed to double check? How? By sending samples to a private lab?
What about software, I can't see the plugin source code, I can't see any tests done, should I have my own internal team test every possible code path before deploying as part of my app (said plugin might leak GPS data and something something idk I'm straw manning).
Essentially "Buyer Beware" is a very limiting ethos, because buyers cannot be experts in everything.
Selling magic sticks should not be illegal.
Buying them with public funds for public safety applications, however...
Selling bomb-detecting magic sticks to military knowing in full that they are not working and people will be put in life-threatening situations trying to use them is malicious and sociopathic, not just fraudulent. If anyone got hurt because of his bullshit detectors let a bomb pass, he should be fully responsible.
Being able to sell magic/fraud legally only means that client will be more cautious when buying.
Regulation is not to protect the dumb, it is to promote competition when the majority of consumers are clever enough to not try a service that has not been proven not to be a fraud.
For example, Amazon would never have worked if it was legal to sell book online and not sending them. People would only shop in local shop where they pay for the book they have in their hands and we would be all laughing at the (few) morons that thought they could trust a website. And that works for simpler things too - would you try a different brand of food if it is legal to poison stupid people, would you even try another shop than the one you trust the owner ?
For one thing, as far as bribes have been payed, I'd like to see this guy being charged to the full extent.
Also there are charlatans selling magic stones or other nonsense to the mentally weak, and I think that humans susceptible to this kind of fraud should be protected from it, so I'd say if he had sold this to private persons I'd love to see him convicted of fraud.
That being said, apparently many of his loyal satisfied customers have been the military or police, and seriously that's pretty disturbing: These are the people trusted by their citizens (well... in theory...) to keep up the peace and safety in their country. And in exchange they get to arrest people, and run around with guns. At the sam time these are the people who were not able to distinguish the equivalent of a dead rock from a scientific device to detect miniscule traces of chemical compounds used in explosives. Sure, there's some blame to put on the guy selling the disfunctional device, but quite an insignificant amount of blame, given how gullible his highly decorated customers were.
I'm not sure that this is necessarily a valid claim. The people who have to use the device are not normally the people who purchased it.
I'm sure that most of us have been in a position where we have been forced to use a product that is inferior or even completely broken, trying valiantly to make up for the shortcomings in the product. The person who purchased the product may have done so in good faith; misled by a smooth sales pitch, or may be actively corrupt and complicit in the deception.
I have no doubt that many of the people who were forced to use this product were aware that something was not right, but I doubt many of them were in a position to do anything but shut up and soldier.
> most of us have been in a position where we have
> been forced to use a product that is inferior
> or even completely broken
> I have no doubt that many of the people who were
> forced to use this product were aware that something
> was not right
But then, this person isn't the one being deceived about the effectiveness "bomb detector" but rather it was the leadership of the whole army/police/security-service who obviously didn't care the least to invest even 1 second of thought into what's being bought (for thousands of $, no less...). So how much thought was put into the effectiveness of the weapons being bought? The procedures of checking cars? The method by which locations of checkpoints around sensitive areas were determined?
The death of people being killed by bombs was the result of the complete ineffectiveness of these "bomb detectors" only to a very little extent, but likely mainly because the whole organization responsible for safety was unable of rational thought and planning.
Indeed. Here in Thailand we also have brilliant generals who spent millions on these things, sold as model "GT200" here. Even after it was exposed as a fraud and the fraudsters jailed the Thai generals insisted they worked, and kept getting young army men killed using them in the south where there has been a insurgency for decades.
According to other articles I've read about the devices, they were advertised as "running on the body's static electricity", and able to detect not only bombs, but also "illegal immigrants, truffles, contraband ivory and 100 dollar bills" from a distance of three miles.
It's utterly bizarre that various governments have paid over $100,000,000 for these things.
I imagine this is just fraud. The government official's brother buys 10,000 of these for $5 and sells them for $5,000. He and the politician enjoy the spoils. Many autocratic and corrupt nations do this trick. Usually not this painfully obvious, but it just sounds like a typical mark-up scam.
Security forces probably love this thing because it gives them leeway into searching and stopping anyone for any reason.
This device is perfect for corrupt politicians and corrupt cops. From a purely amoral perspective its genius. It gives the politicians what they want (graft) and the police what they want (arbitrary searches).
There are a lot of very expensive weapon systems that are only slightly less of a fraud than this.
I agree. I'm fairly amazed that militaries or police forces would buy these devices without demanding tests for validation first.
Someone somewhere has to be collecting commissions...
A similar device showed up with the Egyptian military to detect nothing less than 'viruses' in what's been known as Koftagate.
http://muftah.org/countdown-kofta-gate-egypts-called-cure-ai...
Yeah, the cure for AIDS and Hepatitis Virus C was a nice touch on top of that as well.
Even if you believed the claims in general, wouldn't you want to test the things on live explosives just to get a feel for their behavior?
Here in lies the problem. People who don't understand proper testing protocols won't blind their testing. And they'll subconsciously influence it to work. And if it doesn't work, they'll let someone else who is more "experienced" try it.
Well, it is easy to come up with glib moral indignation. However, more interesting aspect of this story is the prevailing atmosphere of hysterical wars on "terror" and "drugs" which provide fertile breeding ground for this kind of operation. Clearly, authorities everywhere want these kinds of devices at any price. So, whether they work or not is just a boring detail. This is a typical symptom of advanced irrationality, of course. This time, worryingly, on the side of the authorities.
Mr McCormick is a genius at spotting timely market opportunities. The only thing he missed out on is an internet startup around that idea <irony warning>.
As everyone here has said, this is clearly fraud, if not worse. Which makes this line from the article completely crazy:
"Meanwhile, Roe’s device had attracted the attention of the F.B.I., which tested one, determined it was worthless, and sent out a Teletype warning to law-enforcement agencies."
The FBI tested this thing, found it was bogus, and did the equivalent of writing a letter to Consumer Reports. If only the FBI were, I don't know, familiar with some kind of department of the government whose job it was to prosecute illegal interstate acts. Some kind of Justice Department maybe? It's wild that they didn't relay this to a federal prosecutor.
"...sent out a Teletype warning..."
WAT?
This is what we use in the USA for inter-agency comms in the 21st century?
I was in Iraq when these were first starting to hit police checkpoints and the article's description of the utterly absurd spectacle of the technology in action is not exaggerated.
The article made me wonder whether McCormick eventually started to believe the technology actually worked. The fact that he spent hours trying to patiently explain the science behind it when first arrested suggests that either he started to believe his own story or was really, really confident in his ability to lie to others. Of course, the best liars to some extent do believe their own lies to some extent, which is what makes them so good at it....
> he fact that he spent hours trying to patiently explain the science behind it when first arrested suggests that either he started to believe his own story or was really, really confident in his ability to lie to others.
Or he knew that what he was going to be charged with was fraud, which requires intentional deception. Therefore failing to keep up the lie would be exactly the same as pleading guilty.
If this guy can convincingly maintain the lie that he personally believes they work, then he has plausible deniability.
I was in Pakistan a few months ago on a project. Security at the main Benazir Bhutto International Airport in Islamabad were using these. As I arrived at the airport, with massive and completely over-the-top security everywhere, stern-faced soldiers are marching up and down holding these devices out at arms-length.
Terrifying to realise, in that moment, that this is all that stands between a bomb and me.
Obligatory Advertising Gripe: The site/article feature two(!) overlapping modal windows - the top shows an ad, the second layer shows a subscribe call-to-action. You have to close both to access the content. This takes bad UX to a whole new level.
That's pretty clever. Unless you hand every operator a sample bomb (or elephant!) they are very unlikely to ever come across the real thing. The positive rate on things like this must be very, very small, so it would take a really large number of samples to get even one detected bomb.
If you've ever been at an airport where they dust you with a pad (I guess for drugs?), that device could be broken and you'd never suspect it unless you had a sample of some sort.
But of course the authorities who spend the public's money on equipment must have thought about this, right?
The glove swipe tests for explosive material (supposedly).
The conspiracy theory version of this is that the people responsible are really just fighting against the larger nation states. The type of bomb that these things are designed to detect are mostly used by people rebelling against such nation states. So in a sense, McCormick has stuck a blow for the "little guy" in a way that a reasonable person would think impossible.
A true anti-patriot... Possibly the most effective anarchist ever...
What a nice feeling of accomplishment this guy must have, while chilling on his yatch.
No seriously, this is an horrible story. I hope thy all end in jail. Karma will take care of the rest.
"Karma will take care of the rest"
How ironic.
I have a batch of Positive Karma Inverter devices, do you want to buy some? It works on the nuclear quadrupole resonance principles.
If you read the article, you'd see he was sentenced to 10 years in jail (and some of his 'colleagues' also received custodial sentences) and they're beginning the slow process of clawing back some of his assets.
The real issue is that "officials in Baghdad continue to defend the A.D.E. 651" - either through embarrassment at being conned, or simply because they believe in it.
Stories about this device have been posted to HN periodically, going back at least 5 years - https://hn.algolia.com/?query=bomb%20detector&dateRange=all
e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1070732
Shocking that these things are still out there.
Not to be confused with the fake bomb detectors who work every day in the airports in the United States, though their success rates appear to be similar.
But... wait... Don't tell me they've never tested it! I mean with or near real explosives, etc.
Regardless... the responsible should be charged with murder.
The article addressed both of your points.
The people in charge of "testing" the device before approving the purchase were probably getting kickbacks.
The prosecution opted to go for fraud over corporate manslaughter because the former was much easier to prove.
It's very hard to have sympathy for believers in dowsing. The victims of the explosions resulting from the gross negligence, yes, but not the negligent, superstitious idiots.
Just shows the whole Iraq project was doomed all along.
I thought everybody knew that they don't work.
>McCormick’s income over five years approached $80 million.
What an astounding story. A complete con, but man... I wish I had that kind of talent in sales...
It's easier if you can change your sales patter to fit exactly what your client wants to hear.
:O :O :O
Corruption is the main reason of US&allies failures around the world.
Not really, unless you mean that in some really broad sense. I think that when US foreign policy fails it is usually because it is driven more by domestic politics than foreign realities.