back

by eatonphil·11y ago·view on hn ↗
"One reason is that the average skill level of programmers who know Ruby is higher than those who know Java, for example."

Had to double check the year on this one. Things must certainly have changed... For instance, Java is a staple of most CS curriculum. If not Java then often Python. /Never/ have I heard of Ruby being the primary language of choice by a CS department. (Nothing against Ruby, just an observation.)

On the other hand, what is the most popular language/framework for a beginning programmer to learn today? Ruby/Rails or Node? Whereas Java is the quintessential Corporate language.

I'm obviously making some generalizations here. But things certainly seemed to have changed a lot!

1 comments
I'm not sure if the author is just quoting the `reason' here, or actually asserting it.
Certainly! I noticed is assertion and was confused - until I checked the year. Then I listed some of the points relating to my confusion. What is apparent is that I am just missing some historical context. At some point, as the author asserts, Ruby appears to have been a more academic/corporate(?) language than Java. I did not know that.