back
user profile
ashitlerferad
12,192karma·2,558submissions·September 13, 2015
recent activity (2,558 total)
comment
Jim Tcl is available in the distros; at least Debian, Ubuntu, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, openSUSE, Source Mage, Fedora and Gentoo have it.
comment
ISTR NT has other mechanisms for that.
comment
Sell sell sell
comment
A recent manifesto around that: http://pastebin.com/raw/0SNSvyjJ "Leaking documents, expropriating money from
banks, and working to secure the computers of ordinary people i…
comment
Thanks for being excellent!
comment
Zero idea, but if you get an answer, please put it here and or post the GPL code publicly.
comment
ImageMagick shouldn't have been using /bin/sh or system() in the first place. Instead it should use fork+exec or libpipeline. http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/20…
comment
Shell metacharacter and option injection vulnerabilities exist in almost every language, not just C: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2014/02/17/pid-preservation…
comment
libpipeline is a good replacement for the more complex uses of system(): http://libpipeline.nongnu.org/
comment
Meanwhile the supermarket probably wasted many kilos of food the night before and locked the bin they threw it into. That is the crime that should be punished.
comment
Another fuzzer, quite amazing one actually (it managed to create PNG/JPEG images from fuzzing). http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/ …
comment
I'm not sure about the bounds sanitiser, but the address sanitiser is not meant to be used as a hardening mechanism and allows trivial exploits: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2…
comment
Exploitation of some of those issues can be prevented using the new RAP GCC plugin by grsecurity. Unfortunately, it is only available to paying customers. https://grsecurity.net/rap_an…
comment
Using DNS is the start of the flaw.
comment
Will you be getting this merged into LLVM upstream?
comment
Sounds like the LLVM project should be using the GPL. This constant churn kind of turns the MIT license into the GPL but only for small companies and individuals who can't keep up with the churn.…
comment
I think that makes them more trustworthy. If some open source software has never seen a CVE, then that is because no-one actually looked at it in depth enough. All software has bugs and security issue…