back
user profile
matt_d
21,160karma·3,275submissions·April 21, 2014
recent activity (3,275 total)
comment
Computer History Museum: http://www.computerhistory.org/ In particular, Software Preservation Group (SPG):
http://www.computerhistory.org/groups/spg/
http:…
comment
Futures can be created with promises: - http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/future - http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/promise …
comment
> In general, any kind of analysis like the borrow checker will reject some valid programs, as it pays to be extra conservative. You then slowly expand the set of accepted programs, until hopefully…
comment
So, like http://gkoberger.github.io/stacksort/ ? ;]
comment
Thanks, sounds interesting!
BTW, out of curiosity, is there a way to track developments in RStudio like the one you've mentioned? // Preview Release Notes make a note of "Code comp…
comment
Yes! Incidentally, I already have a feature request! :-) As a heavy C++ user (also using R for EDA & analytics), one feature I love about PTVS is mixed-mode debugging: https://pytools.c…
2 pts
comment
Hi! Looks interesting! I have a question -- in particular, the blog post mentions that the framework "includes both server and client code", any my question is about the second part :-) I…
comment
A side note: I think you may be able to simplify `is_compatible` by getting rid of hand-rolled `yes` and `no` constants (and subsequent manual size-testing for `value` computation) and using `std::tru…
comment
Thanks for the explanations!
comment
Thanks for the reply! Interesting that the constness in `for each` caused confusion (did it offer a `mutable` opt-in, though?), would intuitively expect it to be the POLS behavior. I guess given that …
comment
Out of curiosity, how about making `const` the default and requiring `mutable` for mutation? There's already a Standard precedent in form of C++11 lambdas -- and const-by-default has some technic…