artninja1988

>AI researcher Eliezer Yudowksy wrote in a tweet >close article No thanks

Probably agree. If liabilities on the service it would be impossible to operate using the best data leading to a worse service. And I want the better service.

It became frustrating to use google after trying stuff like bing chat and ChatGPT4 that does the search for you. I don't have to think about how to write the correct query. Those are becoming bet…

> Imagine ie eventually you could get new episodes for any podcast in the world through AI. It would ingest the data from the hosts, it would ingest the data from everyone who's ever been inte…

Sounds like propoyed laws crafted by those in power clinging desperately to their control in fear of becoming opsolete. At the end of the day, there is no theft, no matter the pearl clutching moral ou…

Art styles aren't copyrighted. Who cares?

https://archive.is/20231231154421/https://www.ft.com/content... …

Lel. Perhaps the last group of people you should feel bad about being pushed into different careers imo

Scam altman is moatmaxxing. Making a deal with springer, setting up a licensing market everyone has to abide by. Having to get an agi license to purchase a 4090

Why not?

AFAIK facts like happenings in the world are not copyrightable. So I guess the nyt is arguing it's copying their prose and way of writing about them?

Is there any serious competitor to TunnelBear that actually has port forwarding

They released the latest dump today :) https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenAssistant/oasst2 …

Weird strawman. His critique wasn't directed at the methodology or the discovery of CSAM. He just lamented the politics and handling of it by the authors. Rather than improving the dataset, the a…

It's honestly pretty sad that at no time the authors of this paper bothered contacting laion to remove the links and work together to develop better filters. Also pretty interesting, that one of …

This seems to be setting a bad precedent. If they setup this massive licensing market, doesn't that mean free and open source llms etc. will be illegal as they can't afford to license their …

Seems like they go on new funding rounds every other week or so now. What gives?

Why would you even want the ai to have the patent or whatever, except maybe novelty. Presumably the person using the ai wants the patent/ copyright, right?

Laion 5b isn't a model, it's a dataset. Model devs can do their own cleaning before training a model on it. In fact Laion state that this is explicitly encouraged.

A lot of perl cluthiching in this article. Just remove the csam identified and reupload the dataset

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Sure. Why not?

Do you consider photographers artists? I really don't see why we should be gatekeeping the term either way

And the people training stabile diffusion shouldn't need the authors consent to train on their works.

Copying is not theft in general as you don't take anything away from anybody

Congratulations to the EU on regulating other countries technological advances!

No such thing as "stealing" "intellectual" "property"