back
user profile

josephcsible

28,561karma·8,511submissions·May 26, 2020
recent activity (8,511 total)
comment
What scares me is that I can picture some parents having read this and thinking it was good, serious advice.
5y ago·view thread
comment
Why do you think that? It's a risk-reward balance. Why wouldn't increasing the reward tip the scales?
5y ago·view thread
comment
But most children don't. So why not let children who don't live with anyone high-risk go back to a normal life?
5y ago·view thread
comment
> what about the grandma they hug when they get home from school? Why not say "don't go to Grandma's house" instead of "don't go to school"? The former is way les…
5y ago·view thread
comment
> the CDC wants to play it safe Isn't having a policy that significantly reduces the number of people who will take the vaccine the opposite of "playing it safe"?
5y ago·view thread
comment
Pfizer and Moderna only used cells from aborted babies to test their vaccines. Johnson and Johnson uses them to produce doses of their vaccine.
5y ago·view thread
comment
For point 3, that's true of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, but not the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Also, what about this reason? "I don't think the vaccine is effective, since we stil…
5y ago·view thread
comment
You're mixing up two completely different meanings of "unsubscribe". Gmail's unsubscribe feature is to stop you from getting emails from a mailing list. It's powerless against…
5y ago·view thread
comment
Do you think Pixels are locked down, or do you not consider them "good ones"?
5y ago·view thread
comment
Nobody's trying to force you to manage your iPhone. All we want changed is to have the choice to manage ours if we want to.
5y ago·view thread
comment
Why don't you like that idea?
5y ago·view thread
comment
As long as we're pretending things that will never happen anyway, let's also pretend there's a Berne Convention 2.0 to cut out basically every suitable host country. Alternatively, how …
5y ago·view thread
comment
So make that illegal too. Basically write the AGPL into the law.
5y ago·view thread
comment
Isn't there a difference between using an electronic device and basically littering one?
5y ago·view thread
comment
Warranties are for things that break on their own. If the manufacturer of a physical product broke into your house and smashed it with a sledgehammer, they'd absolutely be on the hook for what th…
5y ago·view thread
comment
If I buy a movie on a DVD, should I be allowed to sell it when I'm done with it? If so, what's the difference between that and selling a digital copy when I'm done with it from the cop…
5y ago·view thread
comment
Apple is big enough that if they told the MPAA "unless you let us distribute your movies DRM-free, we're not selling them to consumers", the MPAA would probably budge.
5y ago·view thread
comment
> there is still a distinction made between this and "physical ownership" (e.g. no right to inherit / sell the content). Are you saying this like it's a good thing?
5y ago·view thread
comment
Imagine you bought a bunch of physical books from Barnes and Noble, and then later did something to get yourself banned from all of their stores for life. (If it matters, assume that what you did was …
5y ago·view thread
comment
I'd be in favor of the law having a clause like the "No Surrender of Others' Freedom" clause of the GPL. Basically saying "If you provide movies like this, then you must make …
5y ago·view thread
comment
When you rent something, you're supposed to be told very clearly up front when your last day when the thing is.
5y ago·view thread
comment
I like your ideal policy, but I don't see a way we can move closer to it on our own, unlike the everything-is-AGPL end state.
5y ago·view thread
comment
The only additional obligation that the AGPL requires is that you not restrict to others the freedoms that it grants to you.
5y ago·view thread
comment
You have it backwards. The "control" you're speaking of is actually the thing that the AGPL withholds, so if you care about users having freedom but not control, then it's exactly …
5y ago·view thread
comment
What do you think the word "free" means exactly, in the context of software freedom?
5y ago·view thread
comment
The source for compiled JavaScript or WASM needs to be provided even with just the GPL rather than the AGPL. The loophole in the GPL only applies if the code is actually running on someone else's…
5y ago·view thread
comment
What's your definition of "free"? Because it's certainly not the same as the FSF's.
5y ago·view thread
comment
I disagree that "it hasn't been provided to you". Imagine a regular desktop program that you can only use through RDP or VNC. Is that not provided to the user either?
5y ago·view thread
comment
There's a strong case to be made that grsecurity is violating the GPL by doing that: https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-c... …
5y ago·view thread
comment
Consider "Service as a Software Substitute": https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s... Do you consider it a problem? If not, why not? If so, what …
5y ago·view thread