Obscurity4340

Its not like there aren't still a metric ton of purveyors of liquid death and destruction. People would be better off in every way with the return of Opium dens, at least they don't destroy …

> who else writes tix than cops? Haven't you ever passed one of those speed-testing automated tracker thing that issues people speed tix in the mail automatically?

Represent ;)

That is nowhere near what I was saying, I'm saying that this is the quote that resonated most with me because it tries to take away yet another thing that protects us all, not just criminals, bus…

In case you're referring to the Apple thing—umm, ya they can. They have the NoDataCollected checkmark designation in the AppStore's Privacy Nutrition Labels. Anything they make is offefed&#x…

So you...agree...right?

But how is your sense of agency denied in one sense (1) and affirmed in the other (2), particularly in the impaired driving example where your BAC is way higher and you're more conparittively far…

I guess you could have a centralized removeable unit that costs a fuck ton to replace and jacks your insurance rate up once it auto-alerts them when you've removed it. If you can prove exigent ci…

South Park already did this > CrabPeople. They're among us yet /s

Cant you just use 365 instead of using something less accurate like 12 months (months are unevenly distributed)

Didn't they do that in The Grinch?

Stonewaller-3000

This argument did it for me. > banning e2ee would render crime evem less efficient Yeah, don't care if criminals use something that helps us all protect ourselves and reveal or be vulnerable o…

Try MagicEarth, let me know what you think

All of the logic of (2) does not magically not apply to (1) even if the legal standard doesn't recognize that btw. Like legally speaking you are correct, I'm just pointing out it makes no se…

Who DISCOVERED discovered this approach?

So it like just does the pure unicode or...I don't want to embarass myself by further explicating unassissted llol

Everybody just wants closure and for The Donald to shut the fuck up and accept hes poor now. He'll be fine

This is like NSO's computer in a phone exploit thing level crazy

> seat belt Still sounds like an inconvenience cuz maybe they don't wanna and thats the extent of their articulable issues with it but it still constitutes a violation of "muh freedom…

[]

Rapextfully thats a ridiculous contrived example that internally doesnt even make sense. Alm that time spent on reverse engineering while you're drunk can be spent accepting your current reality …

There's already a social/legal contract in terms of seat belts that a certain demographic already bitches endlessly about. You'll be in good, voluminous (if scumbaggy) company :( Sorry,…

Can I ask how you feel about the larger proposition/regime I'm suggesting? Do you feel criminal trials are the best forum to dea with impaired drivingor or should we maybe update the social …

https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/aan-in-the-media/jih... …

And I'm sure all the analogue-no heuristics/moralistic crusade crowd will feel the same way once they realize they blocked the suggestion that could have prevented their dead loved one (rega…

Friend = Enemy(Enemy)

It shouldn't be [allowed to be] "one" part or central processing chip rhat you can simply rip out. It should be like a nervos system or whatever and not be tamperable in such a banal an…

But to me, thats the real criminal offense. Who would do that drunk if it was basically impossible in the sense it is part ofthe car in a non-central way where there's like bot one discrete part …